Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
Last Updated: 19.06.2025 01:08
A rational person can easily refute a flat-earther argument that the surface of the Earth is not curved. For a flat-earther, however, his (or her) argument against a curved earth, is convincing.
Question: Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
For some atheists, however, the argument is convincing.
Why did lobsters evolve bright colors if they are neither poisonous nor venomous?
Existence of evil => God doesn’t exist
They bring up the argument because they find it convincing.
Similarly, a religious person can easily refute the argument
What is the best interracial stories that you hear or know and want to share?